With the federal Fiscal Year 2020 (FY20) Congressional appropriations process gaining steam, NACWA submitted testimony last week to the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies requesting support for key EPA clean water programs and funding priorities. NACWA will be submitting similar FY20 testimony to Senate Appropriators once the Appropriators open their stakeholder submissions in the coming weeks.

With the National Water Policy Fly-In and Water Week 2019 almost here, now is the time to be scheduling visits with your Members of Congress. It is critically important that, while you are in Washington, you visit with your elected leaders and educate them about the most important issues facing your utility and the work you do every day to serve your community.

NACWA submitted comments on March 14 regarding EPA’s Draft Inventory of US Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2017. The annual Inventory provides nationwide estimates for greenhouse gas (GHG) emission for different sectors, including wastewater treatment, and is intended to be used only for informational purposes.

Members of Congress are home in their states and districts this week during a congressional recess, making this the perfect time for your utility to reach out to your federal elected officials and educate them on the importance of what you do every day to protect public health and the environment in your community.

Nutrient pollution, caused by excess nitrogen and phosphorus in waterways, is one of America's most widespread, costly, and challenging environmental problems. For the San Francisco Bay, the West Coast’s largest estuary and home to over seven million people, algal blooms, fish kills and other nutrient-related environmental impacts have generally not been seen despite 37 wastewater treatment plants discharging to the Bay without full-scale nutrient treatment.

The White House released its proposed FY2020 Budget on March 11. As in prior years, the Trump Administration is proposing major cuts for a broad range of discretionary non-defense programs and agencies, including to EPA and the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF). The proposed budget’s accompanying narrative focuses strongly on prioritizing infrastructure spending, with particular attention paid to clean and safe water investment. Unfortunately, the proposed spending levels for water infrastructure programs suggest a different story and are significantly below current funding levels.

The US House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee’s Water Resources and Environment Subcommittee held a public hearing March 7 to examine the current state of the country’s clean water infrastructure. NACWA provided testimony and emphasized the critical role of federal funding for clean water infrastructure. At the hearing, NACWA Board Member Andy Kricun, Executive Director of the Camden County Municipal Utilities Authority in New Jersey, proposed solutions for the gowning infrastructure gap and challenging affordability concerns.

The US House Committee on Oversight and Reform’s Subcommittee on Environment held a hearing on March 6 entitled, “Examining PFAS Chemicals and Their Risks.” Dave Ross, EPA’s Assistant Administrator for the Office of Water testified in the hearing alongside Maureen Sullivan with the US Department of Defense (DoD). Also, Congressmen Dan Kildee (D-MI) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) testified on the per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination in their respective districts, and the needs of their communities with existing cleanup and greater public health and environmental protection.

EPA announced March 8 that it is abandoning further legal efforts to delay implantation of the 2015 Clean Water Rule, leaving a regulatory patchwork across the country where the Rule is in effect in some states but not in others. For the time being, the 2015 Clean Water Rule is effective in 26 states. Pre-2015 jurisdictional regulations govern in the other 24 states.